Location patterns and factors of Polish makerspaces

Authors

  • Karolina Kapustka Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24917/20801653.383.7

Keywords:

location factors, maker movement, makerspace, new working spaces, Poland, spatial distribution

Abstract

Makerspaces (MS) represent a type of new working space (NWS), a subject addressed by numerous researchers. Nevertheless, among the abundance of publications on NWS, only a limited number discuss the detailed distribution of MS and address the significant issue of their location factors. This article aims to supplement these research gaps based on the example of Polish makerspaces, through a comprehensive database of Polish NWS and spatial analysis conducted through GIS systems. According to the results, there is a predominance of MS in the main metropolitan centers, alongside a rising significance in peripheral areas while a co‑occurrence of MS with other institutions focusing on innovation, creativity and education is recorded. It is also pointed out that location factors related to transportation are mainly found in large urban centers, but not noticeable elsewhere. Through the use of in‑depth interviews, the author points to the significant relevance of social factors in the MS creation phase, together with accessibility and infrastructure‑related factors. In addition, crucial components impacting on MS establishment include the engagement of MS members, municipal support, location and the characteristics of the MS environment. Lastly, the validity of the rules and regulations of organizations supporting the creation of MS are outlined.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Karolina Kapustka, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Karolina Kapustka, MSc, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Department of Regional Development, Jagiellonian University in Kraków. Ph.D. student in Socio‑Economic Geography and Spatial Planning, Doctoral School in Social Sciences (DSSS). The author’s interests focus on issues related to collaborative spaces, in particular co‑working spaces and creative‑workshop spaces like makerspaces.

References

Advikos, V., Merkel, J. (2020). Supporting open, shared and collaborative workspaces and hubs: recent transformations and policy implications. Urban Research & Practice, 13(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2019.1674501

Akhavan, M. (2021). Third places for work: A multidisciplinary review of the literature on cow‑ orking spaces and maker spaces. In: I. Mariotti, S. Di Vita, M. Akhavan (eds.), New workplac- es – location patterns, urban effects and development trajectories, research for development. Milan: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑3‑030‑63443‑8_2

Budner, W. (2007). Czynniki lokalizacji inwestycji a możliwości rozwoju ekonomicznego gmin w Polsce. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Administratio Locorum, 6(3), 43–58.

Capdevila, I. (2017). A typology of localized spaces of collaborative innovation. In: M. van Ham,

D. Reuschke, R. Kleinhans, S. Syrett, C. Mason (eds.), Entrepreneurial neighbourhoods – to- wards an understanding of the economies of neighbourhoods and communities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2414402

Cattabriga, A. (2019). A Makerspace Network as part of a regional innovation ecosystem, the case of Emilia‑Romagna. European Journal of Creative Practices in Cities and Landscapes, 2(2), 83–103. doi: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2612–0496/9536

Coll‑Martínez, E., Méndez‑Ortega, C. (2023). Agglomeration and coagglomeration of coworking spaces and creative industries in the city. European Planning Studies, 31, 3. doi: https://doi. org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1847256

Debowski, J., Campo D., Ryan, B. (2024): The value of a makerspace: cultural (re‑)production and the making of a city. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2024.2319028

Di Marino, M., Lapintie, K. (2017). Emerging workplaces in post‑functionalist cities. Journal of Urban Technology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1297520

Dougherty, D., 2024, How many makerspaces? A fire closes SF’s Humanmade. Maker Magazine.

Retrieved from: https://makethings.make.co/p/many‑makerspaces (access: 3.07.2024).

Friessnig, M. (2021). The role of makerspaces in product development of hardware start‑

‑ups. International Journal of Academic Makerspaces and Making, 1(1). doi: https://doi. org/10.21428/70cb44c5.16766841

Gądecki, J., Piziak, B. (2022). Przestrzenie kreatywno-warsztatowe. Makerspace’y, fab laby i warsz- taty w przestrzeniach polskich miast. Warszawa–Kraków: Instytut Rozwoju Miast i Regionów. Gato, M.A., Haubrich, G. (2024). New working spaces typologies beyond core cities. In: I. Mariotti,

E. Tomaz, G. Micek, C. Méndez‑Ortega (eds.), Evolution of new working spaces. SpringerBriefs in applied sciences and technology. Cham: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑3‑ 031‑50868‑4_4

Gierdowski, D., Reis, D. (2015). The MobileMaker: an experiment with a Mobile Makerspace.

Library Hi Tech. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT‑06‑2015‑0067

Giusti, J.D., Alberti, F.G., Belfanti, F. (2020). Makers and clusters: Knowledge leaks in open inno‑ vation networks. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5, 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jik.2018.04.001

Halverson, E.R., Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063 Høibo, I.H., Seitamaa‑Hakkarainen, P., Groth, C. (2024). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs in Norwegian

school makerspaces. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10798‑024‑09919‑0

Hollands, R.G. (2015). Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8, 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011

Kim, S.H., Jung, Y.J., Choi, G.W. (2022). A systematic review of library makerspaces research. Library and Information Science Research, 44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101202

Lou, N., Peek, K. (2016). By the numbers: The rise of the makerspace. Retrieved from: http://www. popsci.com/rise‑makerspace‑by‑numbers (access:1.07.2024).

Makerspace Map. (2024). Retrieved from: https://makerspace.com/map/ (access: 3.07.2024). Małochleb, K. (2022). Impact of coworking spaces on the local urban milieu. Case study of Poland.

In: C. Tagliaro, A. Migliore, R. Silvestri (eds.). Proceedings of the 3rd Transdisciplinary Workplace Research in Milan. Milan: Politecnico di Milano.

Małochleb, K., Wojnar, K. (2022). Spatial patterns and location factors of collaborative spaces in Poland. Warsaw case study. In: C. Tagliaro, A. Migliore, R. Silvestri (eds.). Proceedings of the 3rd Transdisciplinary Workplace Research in Milan. Milan: Politecnico di Milano.

Mariotti, I., Akhavan, M., Rossi, F. (2021) The preferred location of coworking spaces in Italy: an empirical investigation in urban and peripheral areas. European Planning Studies, 31(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1895080

Mariotti, I., Pacchi, C., Di Vita, S. (2017). Co‑Working spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects. Journal of Urban Technology, 24, 47–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2 017.1311556

Mariotti, I., Micek, G. (2024). Theoretical framework of the location of coworking spaces. In: I. Mariotti, E. Tomaz, G. Micek, C. Méndez‑Ortega (eds), Evolution of new working spac- es. SpringerBriefs in applied sciences and technology. Cham: Springer. doi: https://doi. org/10.1007/978‑3‑031‑50868‑4_7

Mersand, S. (2021). The state of makerspace research: A review of the literature. TechTrends, 65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528‑020‑00566‑5

Micek, G., Baycan, T., Lange, B. (2024). A taxonomy of new working spaces. In: I. Mariotti, E. Tomaz,

G. Micek, C. Méndez‑Ortega (eds.), Evolution of new working spaces. SpringerBriefs in applied sciences and technology. Cham: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑3‑031‑50868‑ 4_3

Mounde, A.A., Amollo, A., Munene, M. (2020). Understanding the maker in academic makerspac‑ es. Africa Habitat Review Journal, 14(1).

Moorefield‑Lang, H.(2015). Change in the making: makerspaces and the ever‑changing landscape of libraries. Techtrends, 59(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528‑015‑0860‑z

Nixon, J., Halverson, E., Stoiber, A. (2021). Exploring making through mobile emergent technolo‑ gies: Makerspace education in rural communities. WCER Working Paper, 2021–1.

Orel, M., Kubátová, J. (2019). Coworking as a model for conscious business. Journal of Global Responsibility, 10(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR‑11‑2018‑0068

Otieno, C. (2017). Makerspaces: A qualitative look into makerspaces as innovative learning en- vironment. Retrieved from: https://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations/441 (access: 1.07.2024).

Peppler, K., Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi

Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500306

Rafaj, O., Danko, L., Zhang, S., Belvončíková, E. (2024). The localization of different types of new working spaces in Central Europe. I. Mariotti, E. Tomaz, G. Micek, C. Méndez‑Ortega (eds), Evolution of New Working Spaces. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Cham: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑3‑031‑50868‑4_1

Rosa, P., Ferretti, F., Pereira, Â.G., Panella, F., Wanner, M. (2017). Overview of the maker move- ment in the European Union, JRC Technical Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: https://doi.org/10.2760/227356

Sala, K. (2017). FabLabs as local business incubators on the example of Krakow. Zeszyty Naukowe Małopolskiej Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej w Tarnowie, 49(1), 75–86 doi: https://doi. org/10.25944/znmwse.2021.01.7586

Sharma, G. (2021). The makerspace phenomenon: A bibliometric review of literature (2012– 2020). International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 18(3), 1–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877021500061

Sutriadi, R., Fachryza, D.M. (2021). A phenomenon in urban disruption: the emergence of cowork- ing spaces in Bandung. Heliyon. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07663

Svensson, P.O., Hartmann, R.K. (2018). Policies to promote user innovation: makerspaces and clinician innovation in Swedish hospitals. Research Policy, 47, 1. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.006

Szymańska, A.I., Płaziak, M. (2014). Klasyczne czynniki w procesie lokalizacji przedsiębi‑ orstwa na wybranych przykładach. Przedsiębiorczość – Edukacja, 10. doi: https://doi. org/10.24917/20833296.10.5

Szymańska, A.I. (2021). Modele biznesu w sharing economy w kontekście grup społecznościowych działających w cyberprzestrzeni. Prace Komisji Geografii Przemysłu Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego, 35(3), 62–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.24917/20801653.353.4

Tiwari, A. (2022). Understanding the shared working spaces: a geography of co‑working supply in Delhi. GeoJournal, 88(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708‑022‑10811‑4

Van Holm, J. (2015). Makerspaces and contributions to entrepreneurship. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 24–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.167

Vogl, T., Akhavan, M. (2022). A systematic literature review of the effects of coworking spac‑ es on the socio‑cultural and economic conditions in peripheral and rural areas. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 40, 5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF‑12‑2021‑0108

Wang, B., Loo, B.P.Y. (2017). Hubs of internet entrepreneurs: the emergence of coworking offices in Shanghai, China. Journal of Urban Technology, 3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1063073 2.2017.1285124

Wang, W., Liang, J., Niu, J. (2022). Site selection of co‑working spaces under the influence of multiple factors: a case study in Hangzhou, China. Sustainability, 14(5). doi: https://doi. org/10.3390/su14052676

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Kapustka, K. (2024). Location patterns and factors of Polish makerspaces . Studies of the Industrial Geography Commission of the Polish Geographical Society, 38(3), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.24917/20801653.383.7