Support for social entrepreneurship in Poland under the European Social Fund – changes and challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24917/20801653.361.5Słowa kluczowe:
European Social Fund, evaluation, results, social entrepreneurship, Theory of ChangeAbstrakt
he European Commission directs its financial instruments to the broadly understood social economy sector, including the development of social entrepreneurship. In 2011, the European Commission presented the Social Business Initiative (SBI), defining the activities of the European Union to support the development of social enterprises (key stakeholders of the social economy). According to the assumptions of the European Commission, social enterprises are specific organisations that combine social objectives with initiatives promoting entrepreneurial attitudes, focusing on achieving wider social goals or exerting social impact. Financial support is also intended to generate changes in a broader time perspective in the coming years of the EP’s activity. Since Poland’s accession to the European community in 2004, the social economy (including social enterprises) has received financial support in many areas of its activity. The beneficiaries of the funds covered not only social economy entities (PES), but also institutions supporting the development of the social economy, mainly social entrepreneurship, such as Social Economy Support Centers (OWES). It is mainly these key entities of the social economy - social enterprises have become places of new jobs and motivators of civic activity. The aim of the article is to quantify the financial support received from the European Social Fund in the years 2004-2016 for activities aimed at the development of social entrepreneurship (SE).
Downloads
Metrics
Bibliografia
Arvidson, M., Lyon, F., McKay, S., Moro, D. (2010). The ambitions and challenges of SROI. Working Paper, 49, 1–21.
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., Wei-Skillern J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1, 1–22.
Balsewicz, A. (2015). Value added generated by social economy entities – economic and social benefits. Contemporary Economic Problems, 11(858), 107–113.
Baudrillard, J. (2005). Simulacra and simulation. Warsaw: PWN.
Bauman, Z. (1989). Sociology and Postmodernity. The Polish Sociological Bulletin, 3–4.
Bell, D. (1976). The Corning of Post-industrial Society. Harmodsworth; Penguin.
Black, J. (2008). Economics dictionary. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers PWN.
Boje, D. (1999). Alternative Postmodern Spectacles: The skeptical and Affirmative Postmodernist (organisation) Theory Debate. London: Sage Publications.
Casey, C. (2002). Critical analysis of organisations. Theory, practice, revitalization. London: Sage Publications.
Clark, C., Rosenzweig, W., Long, D., Olsen, S. (2004). Double Bottom Line Project Report: Assessing Social Impact in double Bottom Line Ventures. Methods Catalog. California: Rockefeller Foundation.
Chen, H.T. (1990). Theory driven evaluations. Newbury Park. CA: Sage.
Defourny, J., Develtere P. (2008). Ekonomia społeczna: ogólnoświatowy trzeci sektor. Antologia kluczowych tekstów. Przedsiębiorstwo społeczne [Social Economy: A Global Third Sector. An anthology of key texts. Social enterprise]. Warsaw: Foundation for Social and Economic Initiatives.
Defourny, J., Nyssens, M. (2012). The EMES approach of social enterprise in a comparative perspective. Working Papers Series, 12, 51–65.
de la Garza Carranza, M., Guzmán-Soria, E., López-Lemus, J., Sierra Martínez, A. (2020). Social entrepreneurship innovation: A study from. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(4), 201–220.doi: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080411
Dufour, B. (2016). Social impact measurement and public management: how social innovation challenges the policy evaluation paradigm – the case of France. 8th International Social Innovation Research Conference: Social Innovation in the 21st Century: Beyond Welfare Capitalism? United Kingdom: Glasgow Press.
Emerson, J., Wachowicz J., Chun S. (1999). Social Return on Investment: Exploring Aspects of Value Creation in the Nonprofit Sector. REDF Box Set.
European Commission. (2013). Regulation of the European Parliament and the EU Council No. 346/2013 of April 17, 2013 on European funds for social entrepreneurship. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:115:0018:0038:EN:PDF
European Economic and Social Committee. (2017). Recent changes in the social economy in the European Union. Retrieved from: https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files/qe-04–17–875–en-n.pdf
Gair, C. (2020). A Report From the Good Ship SROI. REDF.
Głowack, J. (2010). Mierzenie społecznej wartości dodanej [Measuring social added value]. Ekonomia Społeczna [Social Economy], 1, 26–34.
Górniak J., Keler K. (2007). Wskaźniki w ewaluacji ex-post programów publicznych [Indicators in ex-post evaluation of public programs], In: A. Haber (eds.), Ewaluacja ex-post: teoria i praktyka badawcza [Ex-post evaluation: theory and research practice]. Warsaw: PARP.
GUS. (2018). Efekty wsparcia udzielonego podmiotom ekonomii społecznej z Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w latach 2014–2020 [Effects of support provided to social economy entities from the European Social Fund in 2014–2020]. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny [Statistics Poland], Retrieved from: http stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultstronaopisowa/6156/1/1/raport_efekty_wsparcia_efs.pdf.
Jameson, F. (2011). Postmodernism or the cultural logic of late capitalism. Krakow: Publisher UJ.
Juraszek-Kopacz, B., Tyrowicz, J. (2008). Zmierzyć niemierzalne, czyli o pomiarze oddziaływania społecznego. Poradnik dla organizacji pozarządowych i przedsiębiorstw społecznych [Measure the immeasurable, that is, about measuring the social impact. A guide for NGOs and social enterprises]. Warsaw: Klon – Jawor Association.
Kamerschen, D., McKenzie, R., Nardinelli, C. (1991). Ekonomia [Economy]. Gdansk: Economic Foundation of NSZZ Solidarity.
Knight, D., Morgan, G. (1991). Corporate strategy, organisations, and subjectivity. A critique. Organisation Studies, 12(2), 251–273.
Krawczyk, K., Kwiecińska, D. (2008). Audyt społeczny jako metoda oceny działalności przedsiębiorstw społecznych – na tle innych sposobów określania społecznej wartości dodanej [Social audit as a method of assessing the activity of social enterprises - against the background of other methods of determining social added value]. In: J. Hausner (ed.), Social enterprises in Poland. Theory and practice. Krakow: Malopolska School of Public Administration of the University of Economics, 95–120.
Lawlor, E., Neitzert, E., Nicholls, J. (2008). Measuring Value: A Guide to Social Return on investment. Retrieved from: http://www.socialvaluelab.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/SROI-a-guide-to-social-return-on-investment.pdf
Maciejewski, M., Pera, B., Wach, K. (2018). Social Economy and Social Entrepreneurship: the Concept, Entities, Policy. In: B. Knežević (ed.), Social Supermarkets as Entrepreneurial Ventures in Socially Responsible Economy. Zagreb: University of Zagreb, 1–21.
McLaughlin, J.A., Jordan, G.B. (1994). Using Logic Models. In: J.S. Wholey., H.P. Hatry, Newcomer, K.E. (eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 55–80.
Ministerstwo Funduszy i Polityki Regionalnej (2019). Umowa Partnerstwa na lata 2021–2027 [Assumptions to the partnership agreement for 2021–2027]. Warsaw.
Msila, V., Setlhako, A. (2013). Evaluation of Programs: Reading Carol H. Weiss. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1 (4), 323–327.
Narodowy Program Rozwoju Ekonmii Społecznej do 2023 roku [National Program for the Development of the Social Economy to 2023]. Retrieved from: https://www.ekonomiaspoleczna.gov.pl
Ngoc Tuan, A., Pham, M. (2022). The role of mindfulness and perceived social support in promoting students’ social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(1), 145–160. doi: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2022.100110
Nicholls, J., Lawlor, E., Neitzert, E. (2012). Goodspeed T. A guide to social return on investment. Lothian: The SROI Network.
Oramus, M. (2011). Przydatność metody Social Return on Investment dla małych podmiotów ekonomii społecznej. Studium przypadku fundacji Ale heca! [Usefulness of the Social Return on Investment method for small social economy entities. Case study of the Ale heca Foundation]. Ekonomia Społeczna [Social Economy], 2. 13–21.
Parsons, B. A. (1999). Making logic models more systemic. An: Activity. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Orlando. Retrieved from: https://www.insites.org/documents/lmact.pdf
Regionalny Program Rozwoju Ekonomii Społecznej w województwie Dolnośląskim na lata 2016–2020 [Regional Program for the Development of the Social Economy in the Dolnośląskie
Voivodeship for 2016–2020]. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/regional-innovation-monitor/policy-document/regional-development-strategy-voivodeship-lower-silesia-2020
Report (2018). Metaanaliza wyników badań ewaluacyjnych dotyczących wsparcia EFS [Metaanalysis of the results of evaluation studies concerning the evaluation of ESF support]. Warsaw. Retrieved from: https://www.power.gov.pl/media/60892/Metaanaliza_EFS_RCz_2018.pdf
Report (2020). Ocena efektów wsparcia udzielonego w ramach działania 7.6. Wsparcie dla OWES i ROPS we wzmacnianiu sektora ekonomii społecznej Regionalnych Programów Operacyjnych 2020 [Assessment of the effects of the support provided under Measure 7.6.
Support for OWES and ROPS in strengthening the social economy sector RPO – L2020]. Retrieved from https://www.ewaluacja.gov.pl/media/75453/Ocena_efektow.pdf
Report (2018). Krajowy Program Rozwoju Ekonomii Społecznej na lata 2014–2021 [National Program for the Development of the Social Economy for 2014–2021]. Warsaw.
Rose, M. (1992). The Post- modern and the Post-industrial. United Kingdom: Cambridge.
Rosenzweig, W. (2004). Double Bottom Line Project. Report: Assessing Social Impact In double Bottom Line Ventures. Center for Responsible Business. Working Paper Series University of California: Berkley, 3, 30–33.
Sumek-Brandys, B. (2000). Measures of creating additional value. Science Notebooks, 553, 45–64.
Tuan, M. (2008). Measuring and or Estimating Social Value Creation: Insights Into Eight Integrated Cost Approaches, Narberth PA: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Ward, B., Lewis, J. (2004). Measuring social impact: The foundation of Social return on Investment (SROI). New Economics Foundation.
Ward, B., Lewis. J. (2009). A guide to Social Return on Investment. The Office of the Third Sector.
Weiss, C.H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies. NY: Upper Saddle River. Prentice Hall.
Wholey, J.S., Hatry, H.P., Newcomer, K.E. (eds.). (1994). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Vogel, V. (2012). Review of the use of Theory of change in international development. Review Report. UK: Department of International Development. Retrieved from: https://www.theoryofchange.org/pdf/DFID_ToC_Review_VogelV7.pdf
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Prace Komisji Geografii Przemysłu Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Artykuły publikowane są zgodnie z warunkami licencji Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 4.0; uznanie autorstwa-bez utworów zależnych).
