Intersectoral Linkages in European Economies: a Comparative Analysis of Germany, Poland and Slovakia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24917/20801653.402.1

Keywords:

input‑output analysis, Rasmussen method, key sectors, intersectoral linkages, cross‑country analysis, global value chains

Abstract

This study provides a comparative assessment of intersectoral linkages in Germany, Poland and Slovakia, three European economies that differ in scale, structural development and integration into European production networks. Rasmussen’s backward and forward linkage indices are calculated from OECD in-put‑output tables and used to classify 45 sectors into four groups: key sectors, sectors with high backward linkages, sectors with high forward linkages and weak‑linkage sectors. The study examines the hypothesis that larger, more diversified economies tend to have broader sets of sectors with high backward linkages and a lower concentration of key sectors, while smaller open economies embedded in European production networks tend to concentrate on key sectors in manufacturing and logistics. The results reveal cross‑national differences. Germany has the largest share of sectors with high backward linkages (42.2%) and a relatively low share of key sectors (15.6%). Poland occupies an intermediate post‑transition position, with key sectors accounting for 26.7%. Slovakia has the highest share of key sectors (31.1%), dominated by manufacturing, especially automotive‑related activities, reflecting strong specialization and integration into European produc-tion networks. The findings indicate that EU industrial and regional policy should take account of differences in sectoral linkage structures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lyubomyr Sozanskyy, Institute of Regional Research named after M.I. Dolishniy of the NAS of Ukraine

Lyubomyr Sozanskyy, DSc in Economics, Leading Researcher at the Department of Issues in the Real Sector of the Economy of Regions, Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of the NAS of Ukraine. His research inter-ests include the functioning of the real sector of the economy, intersectoral and interregional imbalances, and economic‑mathematical modelling of financial and economic processes at macro, meso and micro levels. He has published over 150 academic works, including eight monographs and more than 100 articles.

References

Baldwin, R. (2016). The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization. Harvard University Press.

Clark, C. (1940). The conditions of economic progress. Macmillan.

Eurostat. (2024). National accounts and GDP. Statistics Explained. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics‑explained/index.php?title=National_accounts_and_GDP (access: 15.02.2026).

Gacek, K. (2025). Sectoral interdependencies and waste generation in Poland (2010–2018): Insights from input‑output analysis. Economics and Environment, 92(1), 798. doi: https:// doi.org/10.34659/eis.2025.92.1.798

Górska, R. (2015). Backward and forward linkages based on an input‑output analysis – comparative study of Poland and selected European countries. Applied Econometrics Papers, 2(1), 30–50. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/wse/journl/v2y2015i1p30‑50.html (access: 15.02.2026).

Guarda, P., Rouabah, A. (2015). Is the financial sector Luxembourg’s engine of growth? Working Paper No. 97. Banque centrale du Luxembourg. Retrieved from: https://www.bcl.lu/en/ publications/Working‑papers/97/BCLWP097.pdf (access: 15.02.2026).

Gurgul, H., Lach, Ł. (2015). Key sectors in the post‑communist CEE economies: What does the transition data say? Communist and Post‑Communist Studies, 48(1), 15–32. doi: https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.12.001

Koopman, R., Wang, Z., Wei, S.‑J. (2014). Tracing value‑added and double counting in gross exports. American Economic Review, 104(2), 459–494. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.2.459 Kubala, J., Lábaj, M., Silanič, P. (2015). Štrukturálne väzby v slovenskej ekonomike v roku 2010: Identifikácia kľúčových odvetví [Structural linkages in the Slovak economy in 2010: Identification of key sectors]. Ekonomický časopis [Journal of Economics], 63(8), 795–816. Retrieved from: https://www.sav.sk/?doc=journal‑list&journal_article_no=11890&lang=sk&part=article_response_page (access: 15.02.2026).

Kuznets, S. (1966). Modern economic growth: Rate, structure, and spread. Yale University Press.

Landesmann, M., Leitner, S.M., Stehrer, R. (2015). Competitiveness of the European economy (wiiw Research Report No. 401). The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. Retrieved from: https://wiiw.ac.at/competitiveness‑of‑the‑european‑economy‑p‑3629. html (access: 15.02.2026).

Leontief, W. (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic system of the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 18(3), 105–125. doi: https://doi. org/10.2307/1927837

Menges, G., Beutel, P. (1974). Triangulation der nach 11 Sektoren gegliederten Input‑Output‑ Tabellen der Länder der alten EWG [Triangulation of the 11‑sector input‑output tables of the countries of the former EEC]. Statistische Hefte, 15(4), 276–302. doi: https://doi. org/10.1007/BF02922911

Miller, R.E., Blair, P.D. (2009). Input‑output analysis: Foundations and extensions. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626982

Mrówczyńska‑Kamińska, A., Poczta, W. (2013). Erzeugung und Verteilung der Produkte des Agrarsektors und der Lebensmittelindustrie vor dem Hintergrund ihrer Verbindungen mit der Volkswirtschaft (vergleichende Analyse des Agrar‑ und Lebensmittelsektors in Polen und Deutschland) [Production and distribution of agricultural and food industry products in the context of their connections with the national economy: Comparative analysis of the agricultural and food sector in Poland and Germany]. Berichte über Landwirtschaft, 91(1), 5–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.12767/buel.v91i1.11

OECD.Stat. (2023). Input‑output tables. OECD Statistics. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/ en/data/datasets/input‑output‑tables.html (access: 15.02.2026).

Olczyk, M. (2011). Structural changes in the Polish economy – the analysis of input‑output. MPRA Paper No. 33659. Munich: University Library of Munich. Retrieved from: https://mpra.ub.uni‑muenchen.de/33659/ (access: 15.02.2026).

Rasmussen, P.N. (1956). Studies in inter‑sectoral relations. North‑Holland.

Stöllinger, R. (2016). Structural change and global value chains in the EU. Empirica, 43(4), 801– 829. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663‑016‑9349‑z

Temurshoev, U., Oosterhaven, J. (2014). Analytical and empirical comparison of policy‑relevant key sector measures. Spatial Economic Analysis, 9(3), 284–308. doi: https://doi.org/10.108 0/17421772.2014.930168

Timmer, M.P., Erumban, A.A., Los, B., Stehrer, R., de Vries, G.J. (2014). Slicing up global value chains. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 99–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/ jep.28.2.99

Vetter, S. (1973). Internationaler Vergleich von Wirtschaftsstrukturen auf der Basis standardisierter Input‑Output‑Tabellen für 8 europäische Länder [International comparison of economic structures based on standardized input‑output tables for 8 European countries]. Statistische Hefte, 14(2), 162–180.

World Bank. (2024). Trade (% of GDP) – Slovak Republic. World Development Indicators. Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS?locations=SK (access: 15.02.2026).

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Sozanskyy, L. (2026). Intersectoral Linkages in European Economies: a Comparative Analysis of Germany, Poland and Slovakia. Studies of the Industrial Geography Commission of the Polish Geographical Society, 40(2), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.24917/20801653.402.1